Odd little comedy.
        
What if Pee-Wee Herman decided to become a detective? What if Encyclopedia 
Brown was still looking for missing homework long after after he reached voting age? What if 
The Adventures of Pete and Pete had been rated NC-17? Somewhere in that 
imaginary universe resides The Mystery Team, a trio of 18-year-old nerds who 
were once lauded as adorable geniuses when they ran their detective agency in 
second grade. Other kids would give them a dime, and they would try to determine 
who put the gum in Janie's bike spokes or who swiped the Pez dispenser. 
Unfortunately, they are now high-school seniors and have not changed a single 
bit. They still talk and dress like second graders and they still solve 
mysteries for a dime. Their only dependable client is a senile woman who bakes a 
hundred inedible pies per day. The three virgins are a source of disappointment for their parents and a 
source of ridicule for their classmates. Until ...
        
One day a sad little girl comes to them and offers them their usual fee (ten 
cents) to solve the murder of her parents.
        
They accept the case and find themselves in a word they don't understand, a 
world filled with druggies, drifters, strippers, murderers and - worst of all - 
people who get them angry enough to use bad language. (Normally they say things 
like "Jeepers, creepers!" and "Oh, fiddlesticks!")
        
I give a thumb up to the young men who created this. While it is not a comic 
masterpiece, it is original and consistent, and gave me a lot of good laughs. 
They did a better job of sustaining a short skit premise for 90 minutes than any 
SNL writers have done in my memory. If the film has any weakness, it's that such 
an unbelievable premise can't work in a real world populated by genuine 
characters, so all of the characters are required to be props rather than 
genuine people with recognizable motivations. In essence, the fourth  wall is 
completely collapsed. No characters seem like real people, and no situation 
seems like it could really happen. That sort of thing can work well in a short 
sketch, ala Monty Python, but is difficult to prolong without becoming 
monotonous. The first time they used a silly kiddie disguise to follow some 
clue, it was funny. One of the kids dressed up like Freddie the Freeloader, 
complete with a sack on a stick, in order to get some info from a fellow "hobo." 
Before leaving the "hobo camp" (the back of a convenience store), the three 
detectives blessed and thanked the drifter to prevent him from placing a dreaded 
gypsy hobo curse 
on them. Since the man was in a heroin daze at the time, he wasn't much 
interested in their discourse, so they just kissed his forehead and moved on. 
        
That was funny enough once, but the "kiddie disguise" gag kept getting 
repeated, and it kept succeeding in the face of all logic. In order to get into 
a "gentleman's club," for example, the mystery team members donned tuxes, 
monocles and stovepipe hats, and affected British accents, whereupon the club 
doorman admitted them, although their only IDs were hand-written. Of course the 
handwriting never really mattered because those particular documents were school 
IDs anyway, thus proving the lads too young to enter. No problem, they were able 
to gain entry with their masterful disguises and a handful of filthy lucre. 
(Maybe five bucks between them.) It was essentially a repeat of the hobo joke - 
and by then the concept was getting tired, and required Python's "too silly" guy 
to interrupt.
        
You can get a few laughs here, and it's some oddly inventive and seriously 
twisted material. Unfortunately it seems to be the same joke repeated again and 
again, MacGruber style, and you'll have to suspend all disbelief to accept the 
juxtaposition of the silly humor with a semi-serious murder mystery. If you 
can do that, you just may find that the 90 minutes have passed fairly quickly. 
Maybe it is "too silly,", but I kinda liked it and 
don't regret watching it.