Name the film I'm thinking of. 
      It's a period film starring Michelle Pfeiffer, written by Christopher 
      Hampton from a vintage French novel, and directed by Stephen Frears, in 
      which two scheming French seducers wile away their dotage manipulating the 
      lives of youngsters. Personal tragedy ensues when one of the calculating 
      puppet-masters falls in love with one of the innocents, a love which is 
      prevented by the machinations of the other sophisticate.
      What's that? You guess Dangerous Liaisons?
      BZZZZZZT!
      Wrong. Not the one I was thinking of. Hey, you should have known 
      because I'm supposed to be writing about Cheri, which was adapted from two 
      stories by Colette, "Cheri" and "The Last of Cheri." 
      It's like Dangerous Liaisons 2: the Wrath of Valmont. And it's not up to 
      the usual standard of Stephen Frears.
      Starting with Dangerous Liaisons, Frears has created several excellent 
      films: 
      
        - (7.60) - The Queen 
        (2006) 
- (7.60) - Dangerous 
        Liaisons (1988) 
- (7.60) - High 
        Fidelity (2000) 
- (7.50) - Dirty Pretty 
        Things (2002) 
- (7.10) - Mrs 
        Henderson Presents (2005) 
- (7.00) - Liam 
        (2000) 
- (7.00) - The Grifters 
        (1990)
But there has been one noticeable failure in his recent filmography: a 
      film called Mary Reilly, rated 5.5 at IMDb, which also was scripted by 
      Christopher Hampton. Perhaps that was a bad omen for Cheri. Not only does 
      this film feel like a 
      Dangerous Liaisons copycat, albeit placed a century later, but it also 
      suffers from a script which includes very little forward motion and in 
      which the most interesting things occur off-camera and/or are recited to 
      us by the omniscient narrator. Frears and Hampton both have tendencies 
      toward the prolix, but in this case, the script is all yakking with no 
      visual payoff, as both author and director seem to have forgotten that 
      film narrative is visual and not something to be followed with our eyes 
      closed as if we were listening to a book-on-tape. Even the film's tragic 
      final surprise is simply narrated to us matter-of-factly. Imagine if Star 
      Wars had ended with the rebels sailing through space toward the death star 
      while a narrator told us "Oh, yeah, they won, destroyed the death star. 
      Got some medals. It was pretty cool. Too bad you couldn't have seen it." 
      This film has that kind of ending. It's not anti-climactic, but 
      pre-climactic!
      And frankly, for a film about sex and prostitutes, it is excessively 
      delicate in its sensibilities. For example, the film has several sex 
      scenes or potential sex scenes, but they are all castrated by editing and 
      lighting. Either we are forced to watch two barely discernable shapes 
      rolling around in stygian darkness, or the camera cuts away discreetly, 
      just as it becomes apparent that sex is about to occur. If you didn't 
      recognize the actors, you might think this film had been made in 1939.
      On the other hand, 1939 was a good year. The lavish Victor Fleming 
      style of filmmaking had its advantages. When Frears is not focused on the 
      plot, the visuals are splendid. There are old-time motorcars being driven 
      through a beautiful French countryside by handsome men and women in 
      gorgeous costumes, as photographed by helicopters. There are impeccably 
      decorated Belle Epoque interiors and the lush, manicured gardens of stately 
      mansions.
      The film can also count among its positives the radiance of Michelle 
      Pfeiffer, a beauty which stands virtually alone in modern screen history. 
      She has a face as beautiful or more beautiful than Jolie's or Megan Fox's, 
      with none of their aloofness, eccentricity, or insouciance. Pfeiffer is 
      beautiful, yet also obviously normal and approachable, with compassionate, 
      expressive eyes. There are very few 50+ women who could fit believably 
      into this role as the lust object of a 25-year-old man, but Pfeiffer is 
      utterly convincing in that capacity. Her body is as slim and narrow as a 
      teenager's. Her chin hasn't the slightest sag. She has only the faintest 
      hint of crow's feet. She is still beautiful, not qualified by "for a woman 
      of 50," but just plain beautiful.
      So Cheri is not without merit. Prepare to be dazzled by elegance.
      But, lord-a-mercy, is this film dull and talky!