Traffic (2000) from Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski)
Traffic is a great polemic, a brilliant argument deeply grounded in reality. I feel sure of those things. I agree with its POV, and I found its depictions completely accurate to situations I know of.
Does that make it a good movie? I guess so. It's a movie that makes a very strong, complex, and accurate point, and it does so powerfully and artistically, with a minimum of contrivance.
There are essentially four stories:
|Although they don't really interweave much, the four stories all affect and are affected by certain common events, to some degree or another. For example, the guy Douglas starts to work with on Mexican/USA border traffic, the "Mexican drug czar", turns out to have been crushing one Mexican crime family only because he was in the employ of another, and DelToro is involved in that story. Zeta-Jones is arranging to have the main witness against her husband killed, and Cheadle is involved in that story. Zeta-Jones' husband is involved with the family that the Mexican drug czar is trying to push out, and his arrest was ultimately generated by this squabble. The interconnections are interesting in the big picture, but they aren't really integral to the individual stories. The point is just to show various faces of the drug war, and how the same economic and political forces affect every level of the social sphere in both countries.||
|It isn't confusing at all. Director Steven
Soderbergh helps us navigate through these stories with a
short-cut. He employs a color-scheme technique to tell us
instantly when he's changed stories. Suburban Ohio is
tinted blue, Tijuana is washed-out sepia/yellow, San Diego
natural hues, etc.
I guess my only criticism is that I wasn't really on pins and needles to see how these stories would come out. The movie seemed to be more interested in making its points about the hypocrisy of the drug war than in telling the stories in an entertaining and dramatic way, so I don't rate it too high on the excitement scale. It doesn't build tension traditionally, because every time I'd got involved in one story it would switch to another one, and I had to get going from ground zero again. It seemed to be a doctoral dissertation, summing up the scenes with the proper topic sentences, but not reaching deep into the gut for the emotional truth.
But that's a pretty small criticism, because it has so much more to offer. This is a wide-ranging and powerful film, and I think we should consider it a plus that it doesn't offer much in the way of satisfying easy resolutions, because there just aren't any.
acting is quite exceptional. Benicio DelToro was
outstanding as the most complex character in the film,
the one guy whose shoes we can really walk in. His story
was possibly the worst of the four, but he held it all
together with his sense of disillusionment. I also
enjoyed Manuel Ferrer as the brainy small-time dealer who
applied scientific and statistical analysis to dealing,
but got caught when he got too greedy.
But I have to be honest. When you come out of this movie you might say, "brainy movie", "damn, he really did his homework", but I didn't feel like saying "I'm going to watch that again".
Return to the Movie House home page