A modern Casanova 
receives a mysterious e-mail listing every woman he's ever slept with, in 
chronological order. He thinks it is a prank engineered by his pals until he 
realizes that there are 101 names on the list and he has only had sex with the 
first 29. He freaks out totally when the next two women on the list are the next 
two women he has sex with. The high-concept explanation is offered by a trio of 
... angels, I guess ... some nearly omniscient guys who tell him that the list 
is for real and details every women he will ever sleep with until he dies.
          
 
 
    
You can see from the premise that I could easily be writing about one of those 
high-concept 1970s Italian sex farces, but this is actually a new American 
movie, and it's not a bad little comedy, with some intriguing ideas, many of 
them politically incorrect.
 
 
 
    
Of course the idea is silly and impossible, but some very good and thoughtful 
comedies have come out of similar concepts. Consider Groundhog Day, for example, 
which is similar to this film in using a far-fetched premise to create a film 
that walks a thin line between outright farce and thoughtful examinations of human nature. The two most important things an author has to do with a premise 
like this are: (1) to get the 
characters to react realistically to an unrealistic situation; (2) 
to get the maximum comedic and philosophical mileage out of the idea. I give 
this author a thumb up on both counts, for producing some good laughs and 
raising some interesting questions at the same time.
 
 
 
    
What would you do if you were about to get married and your fiancée were only #29 
on a list of 101 lovers? Would you call off the wedding, knowing that you would cheat 
on her, or worse, that she might die soon? What would you do when you meet the 
woman of your dreams, and she's NOT on the list. What would you do if a 
centerfold babe from a rich family were next on the list? Would you still make 
an effort to seduce her romantically, or would you just be selfish and cavalier, 
knowing full well that you were going to get laid anyway? If her father were in 
the room, would you still go after her right then and there, knowing that he 
can't do much harm to you because you still have seventy more women on your 
list? How would you react when the next name on the list turned out to be a man? 
What would you do if a known serial killer were the last one on the list? (It's 
a killer of serial seducers, no less!)
 
 
 
    
Some of those situations are exploited for lowbrow laughs. Our hero goes to the 
Playmate's bedroom and screws her senseless. Or so he thinks. The next morning she asks why he 
never showed up. It turns out that somebody else in her family's mansion has the 
exact same name - and the implications of that are totally disgusting! On the 
other hand, some 
situations are used to reflect on some interesting aspects of human nature.  
 
 
 
    
Most of the the comedy and nudity are concentrated in the first half, making the 
second half more sentimental and contemplative. That was dictated by the 
premise. The central character is human, not omniscient, and must therefore  
learn how to deal with his seemingly impossible situation. That's a gradual 
process, which the 
protagonist begins by thinking too little and messing up too much, 
so those early screw-ups generate the laughs. As time goes on, he learns to use 
the gift/curse, and as  he becomes wiser his buffoonery is reduced, so the 
film edges out of farce and into a more reflective mode. Groundhog Dog follows a 
similar tonal path with a similar premise.
 
 
 
    
Of course, Sex and Death 101 is not as strong an effort as the Groundhog Day. 
It's not as hilarious in the funny parts, and it's not as recondite in the 
thoughtful parts. On the other hand, this film has something Groundhog Day was 
missing - high-spirited raunch and nudity. The author of the Murray film knew 
that his central character would go through a raunchy sex phase before achieving some 
wisdom, but that film was coy and oblique in its approach to the subject, while 
Sex and Death 101 flat-out goes for it.
I would have enjoyed the film even without the nudity, but that is also very 
stimulating. (See the nudity report for details.) 
 
 
 
    
The writer/director of Sex and Death 101 wrote two other films I like: Heathers and Demolition Man, 
two more politically incorrect comedies with interesting things to say about the 
world. Heathers is considered a cult classic, and I have often argued that 
Demolition Man is a very funny movie which is radically underrated by IMDb 
voters at 6.1 because people tend to treat it as a mediocre action movie instead 
of a top-notch spoof. Sex and Death will 
undoubtedly end up at that same general level, but it is a fine effort, a good 
raunchy entertainment film with some brains as a bonus!